NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 41% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 706 MHz
Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 2270
Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 6076
Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 19.239
Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 426.305
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.468
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 15.251
3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 38.135
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3721
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2502
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2616
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3721
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2502
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2616

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835 vs 2270
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 vs 6076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18 vs 426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 1.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 vs 15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 38.135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 2616

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 307

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	45.18 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,084 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	323 vs 307

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2835

2270

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

307

323

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

6076

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

19.239

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

426.305

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

1.468

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

15.251

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

38.135

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2616

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2616

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835	2270
PassMark - G2D Mark	307	323
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	6076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	19.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	426.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	1.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	15.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	38.135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	2616
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	2616
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	18 August 2015	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	$1,999
Place in performance rating	806	1060
Price now	$203.37	$1,999
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	16.10	1.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	1,084 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	768
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	45.18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus