NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 771 MHz
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3600 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3228 vs 3211
• 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 vs 5.972
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 vs 355.305
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 1.022
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 vs 15.706
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.204 vs 34.772

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
• Around 69% better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 316
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 vs 10582
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 4941
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2645
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 4941
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2645

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3228 3211
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	316 349
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10582 11427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.821 5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	793.297 355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.631 1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.966 15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.204 34.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4941 6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2645 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4941 6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2645 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3362

Compare specifications (specs)