NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 796 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 56.64 GTexel / s vs 22 GTexel / s
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,812 gflops vs 880.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1776 MHz
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3985 vs 720
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 416
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 April 2016 vs 9 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 796 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s vs 22 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops vs 880.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1776 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3985 vs 720 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 vs 416 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3325
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3325
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3325 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3985 | 720 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14562 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.056 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.697 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5523 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5523 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM206 | M98 |
| Launch date | 8 April 2016 | 9 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $437.75 | |
| Place in performance rating | 591 | 594 |
| Price now | $409.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1163 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 796 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops | 880.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s | 22 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP | No outputs |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 201 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 1776 MHz |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.8 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
| 1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
| 1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
| DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
| HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4870
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
AMDFirePro D700
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
NVIDIAT1000
