NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and AMD FirePro W4190M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

AMD FirePro W4190M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 825 MHz
Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 900 MHz
2x more texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
2x better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 1150
Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 176
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 284.018
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 1.417
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 1704
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2529
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 1704
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2529

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz vs 900 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3446 vs 1150
PassMark - G2D Mark	336 vs 176
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113 vs 284.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 1.417
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 2529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 2529

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M

2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 8148
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3355
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3355

Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	23384 vs 8148
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4190M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3446

1150

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

336

176

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8148

23384

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

782.113

284.018

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.5

1.417

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

1704

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2529

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3889

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

1704

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2529

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3889

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	AMD FirePro W4190M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3446	1150
PassMark - G2D Mark	336	176
Geekbench - OpenCL	8148	23384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113	284.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5	1.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920	1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	2529
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3889
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920	1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	2529
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3889

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	AMD FirePro W4190M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Code name	GM107	Opal
Launch date	3 December 2015	12 November 2015
Place in performance rating	700	1057
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz	900 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	825 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	691.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	384
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s	21.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay