NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3467 vs 935
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 338
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8148 vs 5635
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 1935
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2380
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 1935
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2380
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3467 vs 935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 338 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 vs 5635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3467 | 935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 338 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | 5635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.268 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 | 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Oland |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 702 | 896 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |