NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD FirePro W7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5597 vs 4288
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 vs 52.467
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 vs 1148.367
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7779 vs 6475
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7779 vs 6475
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 13 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5597 vs 4288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 vs 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 vs 1148.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 vs 4.886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 vs 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 vs 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 76 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1,024
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 2,432 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 546 vs 403
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17771 vs 16559
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.472 vs 70.779
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.49 vs 252.607
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 76 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1,024 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops vs 2,150 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 546 vs 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17771 vs 16559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 vs 70.779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 vs 252.607 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD FirePro W7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5597 | 4288 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 546 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16559 | 17771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | 1148.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | 4.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | 85.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | 268.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 13 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 507 | 510 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 242 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |