NVIDIA Quadro M3000M versus AMD FirePro W7000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and AMD FirePro W7000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 950 MHz
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 4% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5608 versus 4280
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 versus 52.467
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 versus 1148.367
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7779 versus 6475
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7779 versus 6475
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 13 June 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 950 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5608 versus 4280 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 versus 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 versus 1148.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 versus 4.886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 versus 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 versus 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7000
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 76 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 1,024
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,432 gflops versus 2,150 gflops
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 547 versus 411
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17788 versus 16569
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.472 versus 70.779
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.49 versus 252.607
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 76 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 1,024 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,432 gflops versus 2,150 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 547 versus 411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17788 versus 16569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 versus 70.779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 versus 252.607 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD FirePro W7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5608 | 4280 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 547 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16569 | 17788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | 1148.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | 4.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | 85.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | 268.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM204 | Pitcairn |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 13 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 508 | 511 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz | 950 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Longeur | 242 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |