NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,659 gflops
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 vs 1146.534
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.779 vs 18.431
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3342
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 7 October 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 1,659 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 vs 1146.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 vs 18.431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1,024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7351 vs 5568
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 409
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23826 vs 16648
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 vs 82.563
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.776 vs 4.91
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 308.42 vs 252.607
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 vs 7779
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 vs 7779
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1,024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 vs 5568 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 vs 409 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23826 vs 16648 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 vs 82.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 vs 4.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 vs 252.607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 vs 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 vs 7779 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5568 | 7351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 491 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16648 | 23826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | 92.634 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | 1146.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | 6.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | 18.431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | 308.42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 | 10572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 | 10572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 649 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 7 October 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 498 | 462 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 1,659 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1,024 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M3000M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M vs
ATIRadeon X700 SE
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M vs
ATIFireGL V7350
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 SE
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M vs
AMDRadeon R9 270
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
