NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
858.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 597

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	29 June 2015 vs 18 February 2014
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	673 vs 597
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 3679

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Around 15% higher core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 773 MHz
2.6x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 80.39 GTexel / s
Around 73% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1664
2.2x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9178 vs 6680
Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27076 vs 18372
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 vs 65.548
Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 vs 732.046
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 5.453
Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 22.384 vs 17.725
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 290.861 vs 217.357
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 6291
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3332
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 6291
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3332
4.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3095 vs 680

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	889 MHz vs 773 MHz
Texture fill rate	213 billion / sec vs 80.39 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2880 vs 1664
Floating-point performance	5,645 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9178 vs 6680
Geekbench - OpenCL	27076 vs 18372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	72.677 vs 65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1293.474 vs 732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.988 vs 5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	22.384 vs 17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	290.861 vs 217.357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8721 vs 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8721 vs 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3095 vs 680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6680

9178

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

673

597

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

18372

27076

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

65.548

72.677

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

732.046

1293.474

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.453

7.988

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

17.725

22.384

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

217.357

290.861

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6291

8721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3679

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6291

8721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3679

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

680

3095

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M4000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680	9178
PassMark - G2D Mark	673	597
Geekbench - OpenCL	18372	27076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	65.548	72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	732.046	1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.453	7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	17.725	22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	217.357	290.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6291	8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6291	8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	680	3095

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M4000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GM204	GK110B
Launch date	29 June 2015	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$791	$999
Place in performance rating	534	432
Price now	$765.93	$999.99
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	10.68	10.82
Technical info
Core clock speed	773 MHz	889 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,573 gflops	5,645 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1664	2880
Texture fill rate	80.39 GTexel / s	213 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	7,080 million
Boost clock speed		980 MHz
CUDA cores		2880
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options	1
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		336 GB / s
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA