NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1344
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 2,107 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 4340
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 498
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 12321
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 vs 33.016
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 vs 2.73
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 vs 70.194
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3382
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 3311
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3382
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 3311
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 773 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 1344 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops vs 2,107 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 vs 4340 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 498 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 vs 12321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 vs 33.016 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 vs 2.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 vs 70.194 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3311 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 vs 732.046
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 vs 17.725
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 6291
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 6291
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 vs 732.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 vs 17.725 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 vs 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 vs 6291 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 4340 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 498 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 12321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 33.016 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 736.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 2.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 31.588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 70.194 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 6373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 6373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3311 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | $854.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 534 | 681 |
| Price now | $765.93 | $446.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | 11.92 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 2,107 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1664 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | 87.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 784 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
