NVIDIA Quadro M4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% de pipelines plus haut: 1664 versus 1344
- Environ 22% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,573 gflops versus 2,107 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5400 MHz
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 versus 4340
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 498
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 versus 12321
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 versus 33.016
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 versus 2.73
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 versus 70.194
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 3311
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 3311
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 versus 22 July 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 773 MHz versus 771 MHz |
Pipelines | 1664 versus 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops versus 2,107 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5400 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 versus 4340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 498 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 versus 12321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 versus 33.016 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 versus 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 versus 70.194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3311 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Environ 9% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 87.81 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 108 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 versus 732.046
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 versus 17.725
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 versus 6291
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 versus 6291
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 87.81 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 versus 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 versus 17.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 versus 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 versus 6291 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 4340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 498 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 12321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 33.016 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 736.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 31.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 70.194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3311 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM204 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $791 | $854.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 534 | 681 |
Prix maintenant | $765.93 | $446.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | 11.92 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 773 MHz | 771 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops | 2,107 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.39 GTexel / s | 87.81 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 108 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 784 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 172.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |