NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5000M and AMD Radeon R9 M395X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 723 MHz
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 2,995 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7000 vs 5195
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 95.613 vs 65.367
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1341.18 vs 799.421
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.869 vs 5.718
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.683 vs 71.057
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 vs 7365
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2154
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 vs 7365
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2154

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1,536
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 471
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27717 vs 22762
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 413.329 vs 366.321

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7000 5195
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	471 733
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22762 27717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	95.613 65.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1341.18 799.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.869 5.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	83.683 71.057
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	366.321 413.329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9399 7365
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 2154
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9399 7365
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 2154
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 3354

Compare specifications (specs)