NVIDIA Quadro M5000M versus AMD Radeon R9 M395X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M5000M and AMD Radeon R9 M395X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

versus

AMD Radeon R9 M395X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 975 MHz versus 723 MHz
Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 93.6 GTexel / s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,995 gflops versus 2,961 gflops
2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 250 Watt
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1250 MHz
Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7000 versus 5195
Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 95.613 versus 65.367
Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1341.18 versus 799.421
Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.869 versus 5.718
Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.683 versus 71.057
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 versus 7365
Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2154
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 versus 7365
Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 2154

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	18 August 2015 versus 5 May 2015
Vitesse du noyau	975 MHz versus 723 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	93.6 GTexel / s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
Performance á point flottant	2,995 gflops versus 2,961 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt versus 250 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 4 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz versus 1250 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	7000 versus 5195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613 versus 65.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18 versus 799.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869 versus 5.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683 versus 71.057
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399 versus 7365
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 versus 2154
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399 versus 7365
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 versus 2154

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M395X

Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1,536
Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 versus 471
Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 27717 versus 22762
Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 413.329 versus 366.321

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	2048 versus 1,536
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	733 versus 471
Geekbench - OpenCL	27717 versus 22762
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	413.329 versus 366.321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 versus 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 versus 3339

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7000

5195

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

471

733

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

22762

27717

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

95.613

65.367

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1341.18

799.421

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.869

5.718

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

83.683

71.057

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

366.321

413.329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9399

7365

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

2154

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9399

7365

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

2154

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3354

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	AMD Radeon R9 M395X
PassMark - G3D Mark	7000	5195
PassMark - G2D Mark	471	733
Geekbench - OpenCL	22762	27717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613	65.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18	799.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869	5.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683	71.057
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321	413.329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399	7365
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	2154
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399	7365
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	2154
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339	3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	GM204	Amethyst
Date de sortie	18 August 2015	5 May 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	460	462
Genre	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1051 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	975 MHz	723 MHz
Performance á point flottant	2,995 gflops	2,961 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1,536	2048
Taux de remplissage de la texture	93.6 GTexel / s	92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt
Compte de transistor	5,200 million	5,000 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Eyefinity
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Taille du laptop	large	large
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	160 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	1250 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Graphiques changeables
TrueAudio
ZeroCore