NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M360

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1041 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1870 vs 1836
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3079 vs 2801
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3079 vs 2801
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1692 vs 1623
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1692 vs 1623

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 16.66 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 799.5 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 227
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8493 vs 6338
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3011
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3011

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	227 451
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1836
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6338 8493
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3079 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3079 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1692 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1692 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3011 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3011 3360

Compare specifications (specs)