NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
1001.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 10471
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 10471
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3338
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3338

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 April 2016 vs 2 June 2015
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11804 vs 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11804 vs 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4193 vs 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4193 vs 3338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
Around 43% better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 854 vs 698
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13811 vs 7915

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Texture fill rate	176 billion / sec vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2816 vs 2048
Floating-point performance	6,060 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	854 vs 698
PassMark - G3D Mark	13811 vs 7915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 vs 3684

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

698

854

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7915

13811

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11804

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11804

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3684

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3684

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4193

3338

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4193

3338

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	698	854
PassMark - G3D Mark	7915	13811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11804	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11804	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4193	3338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4193	3338
Geekbench - OpenCL		37620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		788.464
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		5756

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM204	GM200
Launch date	8 April 2016	2 June 2015
Place in performance rating	241	298
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$649
Price now		$679.99
Value for money (0-100)		23.43
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1075 MHz
Core clock speed	861 MHz	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,252 gflops	6,060 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2048	2816
Texture fill rate	132.9 GTexel / s	176 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	8,000 million
CUDA cores		2816
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		600 Watt
SLI options		4x
Supplementary power connectors		6-pin + 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	224.4 GB / s	336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround