NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs AMD FirePro S9000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 11.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 350 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 24 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 384
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5059 vs 2171
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 337
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3681
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5059 vs 2171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3681 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD FirePro S9000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2171 | 5059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | 561 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.278 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD FirePro S9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 24 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 694 | 696 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |