NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and AMD FirePro W5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 11.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 7 August 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 39.6 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,267 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 568 vs 420
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2974 vs 2811
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10275 vs 8018
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4308 vs 3854
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4308 vs 3854
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 756 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.6 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,267 gflops vs 1,000 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 568 vs 420 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2974 vs 2811 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10275 vs 8018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4308 vs 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4308 vs 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 568 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2811 | 2974 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8018 | 10275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 771.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD FirePro W5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 7 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 561 | 556 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 977 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Length | 183 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro D700
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385X
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
