NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 81% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3667
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3667
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5923 vs 4468
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5923 vs 4468
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 vs 4468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 vs 4468 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 4468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 4468 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tobago |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 532 | 650 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 165 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5750
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
