NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
2.3x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 876 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
6.4x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 300 Watt
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 64.435
Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 198.978

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 February 2017 vs 17 November 2014
Core clock speed	1266 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz vs 876 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	71.86 vs 64.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	245.081 vs 198.978

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

36.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
9.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 512
4.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
6x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17090 vs 15667
Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 832.248
Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 4.039
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.764 vs 65.117

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	17090 vs 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1476.444 vs 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.289 vs 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.764 vs 65.117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

15667

17090

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

71.86

64.435

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

832.248

1476.444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.039

6.289

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

65.117

75.764

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

245.081

198.978

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P1000	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
PassMark - G3D Mark	4454
PassMark - G2D Mark	602
Geekbench - OpenCL	15667	17090
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	71.86	64.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	832.248	1476.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.039	6.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	65.117	75.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	245.081	198.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1591

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P1000	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler 2.0
Code name	GP107	GK210
Launch date	7 February 2017	17 November 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$375
Place in performance rating	523	805
Price now	$319.99
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	15.53
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	876 MHz
Core clock speed	1266 MHz	562 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	2x 4,373 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	2x 2496
Texture fill rate	59.2 GTexel / s	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt	300 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 12 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	2x 240.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5