NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19471 vs 17466
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6135 vs 3360
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6135 vs 3360
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7710 vs 7043
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7710 vs 7043
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19471 vs 17466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 vs 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 vs 7043 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19471 | 17466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 | 7043 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107GL | GP107 |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 454 | 586 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4096 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro V8700
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 560v
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
