NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro D300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
  • Around 39% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 6054
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 6054
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 February 2017 vs 18 January 2014
Core clock speed 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8429 vs 6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8429 vs 6054

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300

  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 1825
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 1825
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1680
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1680
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1280 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3397 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3397 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8429
6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8429
6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1825
3397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1825
3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3351
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile AMD FirePro D300
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8429 6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8429 6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1825 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1825 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1680 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1680 3351
Geekbench - OpenCL 20117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 51.183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1192.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 78.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 242.179

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile AMD FirePro D300

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 1.0
Code name GP107 Pitcairn
Launch date 6 February 2017 18 January 2014
Place in performance rating 701 703
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1607 MHz
Core clock speed 1557 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops 2,176 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 1280
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s 68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 2,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 242 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 140.2 GB / s 162.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 160 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5