NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro D300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 6054
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 6054
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 2,176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 6054 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 1825
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 1825
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1680
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | AMD FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3351 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | AMD FirePro D300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 703 | 704 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 162.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro D300
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
