NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro D300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 6054
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 6054
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 18 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 6054 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 1825
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 1825
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1680
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1680
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 vs 1825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 vs 1825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | AMD FirePro D300 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20137 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | AMD FirePro D300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 18 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 701 | 703 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 162.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |