NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 1024 vs 64
- 17.2x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 176 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 6.7x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 768 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 30 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 768 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2917 vs 1680
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2917 vs 1680
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2917 vs 1680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2917 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 2917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 2917 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 402 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP107 | G94 |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 672 | 1429 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $489 | |
Price now | $186.29 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 59 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |