NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs AMD Radeon E6465
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon E6465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 19.7x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 768 vs 160
- 15.8x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 30x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6934 vs 231
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 354
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1076 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 192.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6934 vs 231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 vs 354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6465
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | AMD Radeon E6465 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6934 | 231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 | 354 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | AMD Radeon E6465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GP106 | Caicos |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 29 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | |
Place in performance rating | 394 | 440 |
Price now | $429.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1076 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 192.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |