NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 875 MHz
• Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 928 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 3 GB
• 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 75.429
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 58.067
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 182.11
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 10021
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 10021

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
• Around 76% better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9513 vs 6935
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 631
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28302 vs 22910
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1414.794
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.854 vs 6.736
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 3316
• Around 14% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3374 vs 2958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6935 9513
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	631 635
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22910 28302
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 3374

Compare specifications (specs)