NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• 166.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 12500 million
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 784

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 9321
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53445 vs 31476
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.416 vs 121.124
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 1958.592
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 vs 8.452
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 510.941
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 11437
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3717
• 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 1676
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 11437
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3717
• 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9321 11300
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	920 784
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	31476 53445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 135.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 3063.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 12.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 883.876
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3947
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 10411
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3947
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 10411

Compare specifications (specs)