NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 1087.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9335 vs 5427
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 905 vs 694
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3627
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3627
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 25 August 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9335 vs 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 905 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3627 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1280
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1676
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1676
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 1280 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 1676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9335 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 905 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP106 | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 25 August 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 316 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 4400 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm (7.9") | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz |