NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs AMD Radeon R9 390

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P2200

AMD Radeon R9 390

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz
746.3x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9322 vs 8928
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 799
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 120.267
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 116.473
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 10445
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 10445

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 June 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 275 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9322 vs 8928
PassMark - G2D Mark	918 vs 799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	121.124 vs 120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742 vs 116.473
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437 vs 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437 vs 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3708

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390

2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44120 vs 31487
Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 1958.592
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.097 vs 8.452
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.381 vs 510.941
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1676
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1676
Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3957 vs 3404

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 1280
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	44120 vs 31487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3164.164 vs 1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.097 vs 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	607.381 vs 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 1676
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3957 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9322

8928

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

918

799

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

31487

44120

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.124

120.267

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1958.592

3164.164

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.452

11.097

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.742

116.473

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

510.941

607.381

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

10445

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

10445

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3404

3957

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G3D Mark	9322	8928
PassMark - G2D Mark	918	799
Geekbench - OpenCL	31487	44120
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	121.124	120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1958.592	3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.452	11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742	116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	510.941	607.381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437	10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1676	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437	10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1676	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3404	3957

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	AMD Radeon R9 390
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Code name	GP106	Grenada
Launch date	10 June 2019	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	304	296
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$329
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	119.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	59.72 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.822 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2560
Pixel fill rate	59.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s	160.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	4400 million	6,200 million
Compute units		40
Floating-point performance		5,120 gflops
Stream Processors		2560
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm (7.9")	275 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	384 GB/s
Memory bus width	160 bit	512 bit
Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Memory clock speed		1000 MHz
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore