NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 210.6 GTexel / s
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 versus 603
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 versus 1718.593
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 28.289
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3691
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 15 August 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 versus 603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 versus 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 28.289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3691 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1645 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1280
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 5 GB
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 versus 9321
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 47331 versus 32445
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 versus 121.124
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 versus 8.452
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 versus 510.941
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 11437
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 1676
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 11437
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 1676
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5527 versus 3404
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1645 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1280 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 5 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 versus 9321 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47331 versus 32445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 versus 121.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 versus 8.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 versus 510.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 1676 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5527 versus 3404 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 | 10465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 | 603 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32445 | 47331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 5527 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GP104B |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 318 | 319 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 7,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 6,738 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 5 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8 GB/s | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P2200 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
