NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 430.6x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 vs 888
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 27.417
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 11173
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3690
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 11173
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3690

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15538 vs 9321
• Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55504 vs 32445
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 121.124
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 1958.592
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 8.452
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 510.941
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 1676
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 1676
• 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7537 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9321 15538
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	906 888
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32445 55504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 150.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 2036.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 14.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 27.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 819.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 11173
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 11173
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 7537

Compare specifications (specs)