NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 versus 888
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 27.417
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3690
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 27 May 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 versus 888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1280
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 5 GB
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15538 versus 9321
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55504 versus 32445
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 121.124
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1958.592
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 8.452
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 510.941
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 1676
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 1676
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7537 versus 3404
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 5 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15538 versus 9321 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55504 versus 32445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 121.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1958.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 8.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 510.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 1676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7537 versus 3404 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 | 15538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 | 888 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32445 | 55504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 7537 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP106 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 27 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 318 | 273 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 5 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |