NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 782
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1892.505
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 118.54

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11691 vs 9321
• Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57151 vs 31462
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 vs 121.124
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 vs 8.452
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 vs 510.941
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1676
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1676
• Around 59% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5414 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9321 11691
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	920 782
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	31462 57151
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 190.366
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 1892.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 13.492
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 118.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 887.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 14998
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 14998
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 5414

Compare specifications (specs)