NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
  • Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz
  • 898.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9321 vs 7915
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 698
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3684
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3684
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 June 2019 vs 8 April 2016
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
Boost clock speed 1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Texture fill rate 119.4 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9321 vs 7915
PassMark - G2D Mark 920 vs 698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3684

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
  • Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 11437
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 1676
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 11437
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 1676
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2048 vs 1280
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11804 vs 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4193 vs 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11804 vs 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4193 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9321
7915
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
920
698
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11437
11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1676
4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11437
11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1676
4193
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2200 NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 9321 7915
PassMark - G2D Mark 920 698
Geekbench - OpenCL 31476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 120.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11437 11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1676 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11437 11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1676 4193
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3404

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2200 NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2.0
Code name GP106 GM204
Launch date 10 June 2019 8 April 2016
Place in performance rating 305 239
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1493 MHz 1038 MHz
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 861 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 119.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 59.72 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.822 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1280 2048
Pixel fill rate 59.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 119.4 GTexel/s 132.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 4400 million 5,200 million
Floating-point performance 4,252 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 201 mm (7.9")
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 200.2 GB/s 224.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 160 bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5X GDDR5
Memory clock speed 7012 MHz