NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 898.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9321 vs 7915
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3684
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 8 April 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 vs 7915 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 11437
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 1676
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 11437
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 1676
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11804 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11804 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 1676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 | 7915 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP106 | GM204 |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 8 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 305 | 239 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 861 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4400 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | 224.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz |