NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 596
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 119.936
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1976

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 vs 9324
• Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 31480
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 vs 121.124
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1958.592
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 8.452
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 510.941
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 11437
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1781 vs 1676
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 11437
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1781 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9324 10909
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	918 596
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	31480 61276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 127.622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 3026.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 18.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 119.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 910.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 1781
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 1781

Compare specifications (specs)