NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 versus 596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 119.936
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1976
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 13 September 2018 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 versus 596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 119.936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1976 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 versus 9324
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 31480
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 versus 121.124
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 1958.592
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 8.452
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 510.941
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 11437
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1781 versus 1676
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 11437
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1781 versus 1676
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 versus 9324 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 31480 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 versus 121.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 1958.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 8.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 510.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 versus 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9324 | 10909 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 | 596 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31480 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
Nom de code | GP106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 13 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 304 | 263 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 5 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz |