NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 1 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1088 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1280
- 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 6366
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 404
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 25862
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 9579
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 9579
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 3489
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1088 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 6366 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 404 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 vs 25862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 9579 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 3489 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6366 | 15451 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 725 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25862 | 63932 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 | 8770 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | N17E-Q1 | GP102 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 377 | 204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
Price now | $4,403.52 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1088 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
nView Desktop Management | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) |