NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 165.8 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 5616 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 2721
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 424
- 6.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 6674
- 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 18.462
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1590.392 vs 427.88
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 1.899
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 vs 23.742
- 12.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 61.965
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 3798
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3651
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3321
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 3798
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3651
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3321
- Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1115 vs 817
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 1 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops vs 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 5616 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 vs 2721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 424 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 vs 6674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 vs 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 vs 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 vs 23.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 vs 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3321 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 vs 817 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 2721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 424 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 6674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 23.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3321 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP104 | GK106 |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 1 March 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | $1,269 |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 866 |
Price now | $799.99 | $225.65 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | 14.81 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 5616 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |