NVIDIA Quadro P4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1202 MHz versus 810 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 165.8 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
2.3x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 768
4.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,304 gflops versus 1,244 gflops
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
Environ 35% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7604 MHz versus 5616 MHz
4.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 versus 2721
Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 versus 424
6.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 versus 6674
8.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 versus 18.462
3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1590.392 versus 427.88
6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 versus 1.899
Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 versus 23.742
12.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 versus 61.965
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 versus 3798
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3651
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3321
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 versus 3798
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3651
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3321
Environ 36% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1115 versus 817

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	6 February 2017 versus 1 March 2013
Vitesse du noyau	1202 MHz versus 810 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	165.8 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 versus 768
Performance á point flottant	5,304 gflops versus 1,244 gflops
Processus de fabrication	16 nm versus 28 nm
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 3 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	7604 MHz versus 5616 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	11545 versus 2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	795 versus 424
Geekbench - OpenCL	42289 versus 6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.325 versus 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1590.392 versus 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.365 versus 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.977 versus 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	751.626 versus 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15267 versus 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 versus 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 versus 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15267 versus 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 versus 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 versus 3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1115 versus 817

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 100 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt versus 100 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11545

2721

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

795

424

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42289

6674

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

152.325

18.462

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1590.392

427.88

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.365

1.899

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

45.977

23.742

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

751.626

61.965

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15267

3798

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

3651

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3321

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15267

3798

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

3651

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3321

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1115

817

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro P4000	NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	11545	2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	795	424
Geekbench - OpenCL	42289	6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.325	18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1590.392	427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.365	1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.977	23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	751.626	61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15267	3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714	3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15267	3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714	3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1115	817

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro P4000	NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Essentiel
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Nom de code	GP104	GK106
Date de sortie	6 February 2017	1 March 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$815	$1,269
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	287	866
Prix maintenant	$799.99	$225.65
Genre	Workstation	Workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	17.17	14.81
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1480 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1202 MHz	810 MHz
Performance á point flottant	5,304 gflops	1,244 gflops
Processus de fabrication	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1792	768
Taux de remplissage de la texture	165.8 GTexel / s	51.84 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	80 Watt
Compte de transistor	7,200 million	2,540 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.4
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur	241 mm	241 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5.1
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	3 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192 GB / s	134.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	192 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	7604 MHz	5616 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0
Technologies
3D Stereo
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus