NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 732 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 210 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3800 MHz
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2133
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2133
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2018 vs 29 November 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 210 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1280 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 448 vs 256
- Around 93% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 2622
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 2622
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 vs 2622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 vs 2622 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1627 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2622 | 4590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2622 | 4590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GP108 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2018 | 29 November 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 805 | 802 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 1,311.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 41.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P500 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4250
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
AMDFirePro M4100
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
NVIDIAQuadro P500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
