NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P500

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 796 MHz
Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1163 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3325
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3325

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2018 vs 8 April 2016
Core clock speed	1455 MHz vs 796 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz vs 1163 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

2.7x more texture fill rate: 56.64 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,812 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 5012 MHz
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4000 vs 1652
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 239
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14591 vs 6366
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5523 vs 2622
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5523 vs 2622

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	56.64 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 256
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4000 vs 1652
PassMark - G2D Mark	565 vs 239
Geekbench - OpenCL	14591 vs 6366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5523 vs 2622
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5523 vs 2622

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1652

4000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

239

565

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6366

14591

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2622

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2622

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3325

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3325

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P500	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
PassMark - G3D Mark	1652	4000
PassMark - G2D Mark	239	565
Geekbench - OpenCL	6366	14591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2622	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2622	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		225.868

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P500	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GP108	GM206
Launch date	5 January 2018	8 April 2016
Place in performance rating	785	572
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$437.75
Price now		$409.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1163 MHz
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	796 MHz
Floating-point performance	679.9 gflops	1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	768
Texture fill rate	21.25 GTexel / s	56.64 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,800 million	2,940 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	3x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		201 mm
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12_1	12
Vulkan
OpenGL		4.5
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	32.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Shared memory	0
Technologies
CUDA
Multi Monitor
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management