NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs AMD Radeon Vega 11

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and AMD Radeon Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 4.3x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
  • 417.7x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 57.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2091 vs 1857
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2156
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2156
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 2475
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 2475
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 February 2018
Core clock speed 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s vs 57.2 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2091 vs 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 vs 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 vs 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3566 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3566 vs 2475

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

  • Around 83% higher pipelines: 704 vs 384
  • 51.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 1800 million
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 237
  • Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13318 vs 7960
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 2295
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 2295
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 704 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 478 vs 237
Geekbench - OpenCL 13318 vs 7960
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
237
478
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2091
1857
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7960
13318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3343
Name NVIDIA Quadro P520 AMD Radeon Vega 11
PassMark - G2D Mark 237 478
PassMark - G3D Mark 2091 1857
Geekbench - OpenCL 7960 13318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3566 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3566 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2295 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2295 3343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 371.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 248.838
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P520 AMD Radeon Vega 11

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 5.0
Code name GP108 Owl
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 February 2018
Place in performance rating 758 886
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1493 MHz 1300 MHz
Core clock speed 1303 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 704
Pixel fill rate 23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s 57.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 1800 million 35 Watt
Floating-point performance 1,830 gflops
Transistor count 4,940 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Interface IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.10 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 System Shared

Technologies

Multi Monitor