NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro M500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1029 MHz
  • Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1124 MHz
  • 1328.7x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 vs 188
  • Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2105 vs 1170
  • Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7368 vs 5935
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2174
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2174
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 1729
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 1729
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 27 April 2016
Core clock speed 1303 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Boost clock speed 1493 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 243 vs 188
PassMark - G3D Mark 2105 vs 1170
Geekbench - OpenCL 7368 vs 5935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 vs 2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 vs 2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3566 vs 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3566 vs 1729

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M

  • 60x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 1800 million
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3122 vs 2295
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3122 vs 2295
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3122 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3122 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M500M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
243
188
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2105
1170
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7368
5935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
1729
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3122
Name NVIDIA Quadro P520 NVIDIA Quadro M500M
PassMark - G2D Mark 243 188
PassMark - G3D Mark 2105 1170
Geekbench - OpenCL 7368 5935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3566 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3566 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2295 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2295 3122

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P520 NVIDIA Quadro M500M

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell
Code name GP108 GM108
Launch date 27 May 2019 27 April 2016
Place in performance rating 766 1073
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1493 MHz 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1303 MHz 1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 384
Pixel fill rate 23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 1800 million 30 Watt
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Interface MXM-A (3.0)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.10 GB/s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
nView Display Management
Optimus