NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GRID K260Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3317 vs 2949
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 547 vs 361
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1898
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1954
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1898
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1954
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 February 2017 vs 28 June 2013
Core clock speed 1329 MHz vs 745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3317 vs 2949
PassMark - G2D Mark 547 vs 361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 1898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 1954
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 1898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 1954

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q

  • 2.7x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
  • 2x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
  • Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4012 MHz
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 4662
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 4662
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 384
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 4012 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6474 vs 4662
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6474 vs 4662

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K260Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3317
2949
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
547
361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4662
6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
1898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
1954
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4662
6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
1898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
1954
Name NVIDIA Quadro P600 NVIDIA GRID K260Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 3317 2949
PassMark - G2D Mark 547 361
Geekbench - OpenCL 11181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 35.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 141.164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4662 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 1898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 1954
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4662 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 1898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 1954

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P600 NVIDIA GRID K260Q

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP107 GK104
Launch date 7 February 2017 28 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $178 $937
Place in performance rating 561 558
Price now $169.99
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 22.11

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1557 MHz
Core clock speed 1329 MHz 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,117 gflops 2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 1536
Texture fill rate 34.92 GTexel / s 95.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.19 GB / s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5