NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GRID K260Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3317 vs 2949
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 547 vs 361
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1898
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1954
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1898
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1954
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 28 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3317 vs 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 547 vs 361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1954 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
- 2x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 4662
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 4662
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 1,117 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 vs 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 vs 4662 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GRID K260Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3317 | 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 547 | 361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 28 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | $937 |
Place in performance rating | 561 | 558 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |