NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1006 MHz
• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 195 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 533 vs 530
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 99.577
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3666
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3306
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3666
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

• 3.7x more texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 34.92 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5568 vs 3317
• Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18403 vs 11181
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.086 vs 35.134
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 4662
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 4662

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3317 5568
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	533 530
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11181 18403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.134 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.164 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4662 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4662 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3306

Compare specifications (specs)