NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 802.4x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 521
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 133.458
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3329
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3327
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 11181
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 35.134
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4662
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4662
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 1,117 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 3327 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 35.134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 4662 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | $149 |
| Place in performance rating | 556 | 707 |
| Price now | $169.99 | $299.01 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | 15.02 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P600 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5830
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
