NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1219 MHz
• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 19% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 2629
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 432
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 10611
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 29.959
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 2.893
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 49.305
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 122.245
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3607
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3359
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3607
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 773.248
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 vs 3575
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 2629
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 432
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 10611
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 29.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 864.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 2.893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 49.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 122.245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3359

Compare specifications (specs)