NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 22 GTexel / s
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 880.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1776 MHz
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3645 vs 720
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 416
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3350
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s vs 22 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops vs 880.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1776 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3645 vs 720 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 vs 416 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
Pipelines | 800 vs 512 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3645 | 720 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP107 | M98 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 597 | 594 |
Price now | $176.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | 880.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 22 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 56.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1776 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |