NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro P620

vs

NVIDIA Quadro K600

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 876 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
• 4.4x better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 41 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 728
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 278
• 6.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 1830
• 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 6.367
• 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 118.389
• 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 0.396
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 7.921
• 19.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 9.393
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 1227
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 1745
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 2261
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 1227
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 1745
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 2261

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

Compare specifications (specs)