NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA Quadro K600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
- 4.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 336.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 41 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- 5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 728
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 278
- 6.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 1830
- 6.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 6.367
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 118.389
- 7.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 0.396
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 7.921
- 19.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 9.393
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 1227
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 1745
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 2261
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 1227
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 1745
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 2261
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 1 March 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 876 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 336.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 41 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 1830 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 9.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 2261 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro K600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 1830 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 9.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 2261 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | GP107 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 1 March 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 1367 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $78.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 11.66 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 876 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 336.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 41 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 160 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |