NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro P620 und NVIDIA Quadro K600 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 45% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1266 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 3.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
- 2.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 192
- 4.4x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,490 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Etwa 3% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 40 Watt vs 41 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 728
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 278
- 6.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 1830
- 6.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 6.367
- 6.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 118.389
- 7.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 0.396
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 7.921
- 19.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 9.393
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 1227
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 1745
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 2261
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 1227
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 1745
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 2261
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 February 2018 vs 1 March 2013 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1266 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 46.56 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 192 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,490 gflops vs 336.4 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 vs 728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 vs 1830 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 vs 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 vs 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 vs 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 vs 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 vs 9.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 vs 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 vs 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 2261 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro K600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 1830 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 9.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 2261 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Pascal | Kepler |
Codename | GP107 | GK107 |
Startdatum | 1 February 2018 | 1 March 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 583 | 1367 |
Jetzt kaufen | $176.99 | $78.99 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 25.53 | 11.66 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1354 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1266 MHz | 876 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,490 gflops | 336.4 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 512 | 192 |
Texturfüllrate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 40 Watt | 41 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Länge | 145 mm | 160 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 64.19 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | DDR3 |