NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1063 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 391
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3698
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3341
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3698
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3341

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• 3.7x more texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 512
• 3.7x better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 vs 3670
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37924 vs 12475
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 43.877
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 773.248
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 3.082
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 53.425
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 184.343
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 3575
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 9097
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 391
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 37924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 523.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3341

Compare specifications (specs)